Tag Archives: Scripture

Where Christ Is We Are

John 14:3 reads, "And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and take you to my side, that where I am, you also are."

First, the Greek term usually translated "receive" is παραλήμψομαι. However, it's meaning is not passive but active and even aggressive. Hence it not only means "receive" but "take to oneself".

It describes what a parent would do when a child steps into the street in front of on coming traffic. The parent reaches out and takes the child to themselves and to safety.

This is much more descriptive of the actually meaning of the text. Christ is not coming back to receive us but is coming back to "take us to his side".

The other important part of this passage is the tense of the verbs. παραλήμψομαι has a future tense to it meaning "I will come and take you to my side". 

This makes sense. Christ is speaking this at the Passover. He will be crucified, he will die, he will be buried and then he will rise. He will then come back to them. All of this is a future event relative to the night of the Passover.

However, most then translate the next part of Christ saying as, "That where I am, you may be also." Although this makes the English smooth, it is an incorrect translation and is misleading.

Literally in the Greek it reads, "That where I am, also you are." The meaning is clear. Once the future death and resurrections takes place, Christ will return in the future to take them to His side. And what will this accomplish? Not that they "may also be there" but that "where He is, we are".

In other words, once Christ secures the victory over death and sin, in His death and resurrection, He takes us along side Himself, and in so doing, where He now is (at the right hand of the Father on the other side of death in the resurrection) we are also there now. Thus this is not a future or potential state. It is the state we reside in, at this very moment, as believers in Christ. 

© 2010, VoiceWind. . .Greg Loveless. All rights reserved.

Incoming search terms:

  • παραλήμψομαι
Share

Biblical Inspiration Verses Translation

During my days as a Director of Information Technology in the Corporate world I was sitting in the lunch room reading my Greek New Testament. A fellow associate asked what I was reading. When I informed her that it was the Greek New Testament, she responded, "I only read the truly inspired Bible, the King James Version".

When I attempted to explain to her that the Greek I was reading was the original text that even the translators of the King James Version used when they did their translation, her response was, "Only the King James Version is inspired." 

Of course I immediately thought of the passage in II Timothy 3:16 which says, "Every scripture inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness."

Note that it does not say "translation" it says "scripture".

Some insist that we must use a certain translation of the Bible to know the truth. This is the case even when this translation is difficult to understand.

For example there are over 250 terms used in the King James Version that no longer have the same meaning today that they did at that time of the translation. In fact in some cases the meaning is the exact opposite. This makes it cumbersome to understand. In some cases the translation is so difficult and laborious for the modern reader that they choose not to read Scripture at all if they have to read a version that speaks in 17th Century English. And who can blame them.

So when someone insists that this or that translation must be used they have placed the translation above Scripture itself. And why have they done this? Only becaue they are comfortable with that translation. This is to place my "personal preference" above the eternal life of others. This is probably one of the most selfish acts one can participate in.

It is true that at the time the King James was translated it was in many respects a work of God in how it conveyed the truth of Scripture. And it is true that for hundreds of years it did the work of God. But let's be clear; it was not the translation that did the work, it was Scripture that did the work. The translation was simply a tool to convey the truth of Scripture to those generations.

Thus, regardless of the beauty of the translation, if it no longer has an effect, then the translation is not doing its job which is to convey the truth of Scripture to the current generation. In this case we should acknowledge the value of the King James Version for its time. But we should now seek new ways to convey the truth of Scripture to the current generation.

In fact this is done on a daily basis through out the world in other languages. We translate scripture into evey language on earth, people read it, and come to the truth and become believers in Christ. And yet these translations are not the King James Version. So it is not the translation, it is Scripture that is effective.

After all it does not say,"All translations are inspired…" It says, "All Scripture is inspired…" So it's not about the translation, its about Scripture. It is not about bringing a certain translation to the current generation. It's about bringing the truth of Scripture to the current generation. And this should be done by whatever translation can best accomplish this result. Only then have we truly said yes to the Great Command "to go to all nations…". It is this that we as believers have been charged with – "To go into all the earth…" not just the earth that understands the King James Version!

© 2010, VoiceWind. . .Greg Loveless. All rights reserved.

Share

When Scripture is Hard to Understand

Christians who choose not to read certain portions or entire books of the Bible, remind me of some of my players that come to me for a pitching or hitting lesson.

These players pay and take a lesson from me not because they know how to hit or pitch, but because they have failed and need someone to guide them.

And why have they failed? Because they have reached a point in their journey where there is a disconnect in their intuitive approach.

In any journey, especially a spiritual journey, there will be portions of that journey that we can choose to follow simply because they make sense or are intuitive. But there are times in any journey when the correct choice is counter intuitive. The key to success is to identify these counter intuitive moments and then apply the correct process.

For example, a pitcher may have three flaws in her pitching motion. The adjustment to correct two of them makes sense to her so she makes the adjustments and improves. But the third adjustment does not make sense to her. If she follows her sense of what is right she will continue to fail. However, if she follows my advice (her mentor who has been to the mountain top that she has never been to but wants to ascend) and she does this even when it goes against everything that makes sense to her, she will have a break through and will become a better pitcher.

The same is true of Scripture. There are portions that will speak to us directly as if it was written just for us. It is intuitive. And then there are portions (and for many these are in the OT and Paul) that we all struggle to connect to our lifes. As a result, since we do not see the immediate benefit, just like one of my pitchers, we opt to follow our intuition so we say, “These do not apply.”

Scripture, God Breathed with His Spirit, is our Spiritual mentor that has been to the mountain top we seek to ascend, eternal life. To say this or that portion of Scripture does not make sense so I will not partake is really to choose to guide ourselves rather than allow God through His Spirit in Scripture to guide us.

As I tell my pitchers, “So you don’t like that drill? That’s because it’s a good drill. It is correcting a flaw in your technique. That’s why you don’t like it. If it were easy it would be reinforcing your bad technique. It’s hard because it is correcting your bad technique. If you choose, not to do, what you do not like to do, you will be the same pitcher a year from now that you are today.”

To choose to read only the books of the Bible we like and agree with, is to choose to be the same, spiritually, as a person a year from now. In Christ, we are called to be more than this.

© 2010, VoiceWind. . .Greg Loveless. All rights reserved.

Share

LifeChurch.tv FAQ Series Week 3 Joke Controversy

The recent LifeChurch.tv Series FAQ Week #3 Message created some controversy on some Network Campuses. I was contacted via email by a leader from one of these Network Churches where there was some negative feedback. They asked if our Network Church had any negative feedback, and if we so, how did we handled it. Specifically they were referring to Craig Groeschel's jokes using the following passages.

  1. "You must not touch it, or you will die." Genesis 3:3
  2. "Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might." Ecclesiastes 9:10

As background, our church is mostly older – baby boomers and up – with five new young families who have started attending regularly since we became a LifeChurch.tv Network church. Four of these new families have asked how to become members and one couple has recently been baptized. The new families range in age from late 20's to just under 40.

Prior to becoming a Network Church we were a traditional older church so even the idea of a video Message was somewhat foreign to many of our older members.

That as a back drop – I have not had any negative feed back from those in our church who heard any of the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) topics, etc. Also, I sit in the back because I run the video controls, so I can see everyone's responses to what Craig Groeschel says. But I did not notice any unusual responses from those attending.

That said, I will tell you that the two verses you refer to in FAQ #3 did cause me to pause. As a result, since I am able to preview the messages I decided before both FAQ #2 & #3 we would make an announcement that the content was definitely PG13. I also mentioned that if any of us long time believers thought the content was a little edgy or inappropriate, we needed to understand why Craig Groeschel was addressing these topics.

I explained that LifeChurch.tv, both their United Campuses and their Network Campuses are drawing in a lot of new believers especially in the "X", "Y" and Millennium Generation. Many of these new believers have little or no background in Biblical teaching and how to live a Christ centered life. They attend a LifeChurch.tv Experience, accept Christ, but then often continue with their old life style thereby creating a total disconnect – hence the need to address these topics.

Also, unlike the baby boomers, where certain topics were considered off limits, the "X" and "Y" generation freely talk about sex, etc. in public much more so than past generations. My wife and I have often noticed this when we are attending training sessions for our business. When these trainings are led by someone who is in the “X” and “Y” generations, the topics are much more edgy than when baby boomers are running the trainings.

So were the comments inappropriate and/or irreverent?

My take would be no and for this reason. I have lost track of the number of jokes, etc. about Scripture passages I have heard over the years during sermons. And that includes Craig Groeschel, especially his cat jokes where he frequently uses scripture. So that would lead me to conclude that if someone complained about using the above passages in a joking manner, it was not the humor that was at issue, rather it was the topic that flipped the switch for some.

So how does one deal with that fact? I attack it using the book of Acts. When we take into account the Jewish culture of that day in the Book of Acts, and what some of the Gentile Christians were doing, and how offensive these things were to the Jewish Christians, Craig Groeschel's comments and jokes using Scripture don't even register.

An example of the disconnect between the Jewish and Gentile believers is in Acts 10. It deals with the issue of Jewish Christians and their idea of how things should work as contrasted with how things actually took place among the Gentile Christians. In Acts 10:45 is says, “All the circumcised believers who came with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also.” The Greek term that is translated “amazed” is ἐξέστησαν. It literally means:

  1. to change from one condition to another
  2. to put out of its place
  3. to drive one out of one's senses

The idea conveyed with this term is simply this; what happened at that moment was a total disconnect from the Jewish believers accepted reality. For the Jewish believer God’s Spirit only rested on those who were circumcised. For many Jews it was impossible for the uncircumcised to have the Spirit because the uncircumcised were unclean and the Spirit could not take up residence with the unclean as it would be defiled. And since Cornelius’ was a gentile and they were in his home, it was not possible, as far as the Jewish believers were concerned, for these Gentiles to have the same Spirit the Jewish believers had, at least not until they were circumcised.

Basically what the passage is saying is this events put them out of their place, it drove them outside their senses, or it drove them outside what made sense to them or it drove them away from what was acceptable in their eyes.

I help run the services at our church and I am continually reminding our members that "it is not about us, it's about them". The "them" referring to those who have yet to come to Christ or who have yet to learn how to fully walk in His path. Since it is not about us, but them, we have to be willing to be uncomfortable at times. For me, this topic would be one of those times. But I willingly surrender to it for the sake of those who might come to Christ or might walk more fully as one of His followers.

Or as Andy Stanley put it “Most churches are designed for Church People.” But we should not do things just to make the “Church People” comfortable. Rather we should at all times seek to convey the Message – to believe in Christ and to devote one’s life to Him – to all who are lost or seek to walk His path.

Andy Stanley Message on "Churches that are for Church People"
It doesn’t matter who you are, what you believe, or what you’ve done—there’s a place for you in the local church. It’s not a building. It’s a movement of people following a loving God and serving each other. Come see the spot carved out just for you. Join us as we discover A Place for Everyone.
 

Another passage that relates to this situation is Acts 15:1 which says, “Some men came down from Judea and began teaching the brethren, “Unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.””

Then in 15:2 it describes the confrontation. “And when Paul and Barnabas had great dissension and debate with them…”

The Greek term translated dissension literally means, "dissension, uproar, insurrection and/or sedition". In other words this is not a simple disagreement. This is an intense disagreement with people taking sides to the point of insurrection or sedition.

Depending on the direction this issue will take, it will completely change the nature of what it means to be a Christian. Paul and Barnabas take a stand for the Gentiles even though the Christian Pharisees believed the Gentiles were unclean – by unclean that means lower than a dog. This would be far more offensive to them than Craig Groeschel’s joke is to us.

Another point to make on this issue is the entire New Testament is written in what is known as Koine Greek also called common Greek. It was the Greek used by Alexander’s solders and was the Greek used for business transactions, etc.. For many at that time, all quality literature was written in Classical Greek. Any literature written in Koine Greek was considered less than desirable.

So why did they use Koine Greek? Because it was not about status or reverence, rather it was all about communicating the truth of the good news to all. And the best way to do that is to meet people where they are, not where they should be. Even if a few of the cultured elites were offended by the grammar and language used to tell the story, it needed to be communicated to all.

One more item that will help in understanding why Craig Groeschel pushes the envelope a little, even if it creates some controversy among believers, is explained in the Series "Dangerous Church 2".

For those who are struggling with the topics in the FAQ Series, "Dangerous Church 2" will answer a lot of those questions.

Basically what the Series teaches is that we need to understand we are not called to be a safe church. When we are with Jesus, we become dangerous to the status quo.

Over 2000 years ago, God used twelve ordinary men to transform the world. As followers of Christ, the call on our lives is no less. We are to be a dangerous people, allowing ourselves to be Gods vessel for accomplishing extraordinary things. When is the last time you believed God for something extra...
 
Finally, for those who want to sit back a criticize. I say this. In some respects this controversy is a good problem for a church to have. It means LifeChurch.tv is reaching the lost and then having to address these life styles that are inconsistent with Biblical teaching. The fact that some churches are not having to deal with these types of issues does not provide proof that they are better, purer or more Christ like. It just means they do not have this kind of problem probably because they are not reaching the lost.

© 2010, VoiceWind. . .Greg Loveless. All rights reserved.

Incoming search terms:

  • craig groeschel controversy
  • lifechurch tv dangerous new church
  • lifechurch tv controversy
  • is craig groeschel jewish
  • i s will mancini of church unique a false teacher
  • how to turn around a dying church
  • dangerous churchncraig groeschell
  • dangerous church 2 craig groeschell video
  • Craig Groeschel false teacher
  • craig groeschel dangerous church
Share

© 2008-2012 VoiceWind All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright